Now reportedly silencing those critical of its plan to filter the Internet of "offensive" and illegal material.I've mentioned before how the Australian govt is moving ahead with plans to have ISPs filter porn and other internet content deemed inappropriate for children despite findings that they aren't effective and reportedly degrade connection speeds by an alarming 86%. Now comes word that the office of the Communications Minister, Stephen Conroy, is trying to silence critics of the plan after one of his advisors wrote an “intimidating” email to Mark Newton, an engineer at the ISP Internode, who criticized the plan on the Whirlpool broadband community forum by saying it would not work and could even enable child abuse. “In your capacity as a board member of the IIA (Internet Industry Association) I would like to express my serious concern that a IIA member would be sending out this sort of message,” the email from Mr Conroy’s advisor Belinda Dennett read. “I have also advised (IIA chief executive) Peter Coroneos of my disappointment in this sort of irresponsible behaviour.” Newton also criticizes the plan in an interview with Tech Wired Australia:
Under the scheme there will be two filter tiers: one which blocks illegal material like child pornography; and another, referred to in a department press release, which blocks a list of material deemed unsuitable for children. Users can opt out of the latter, but there is no opt-out for “illegal content." “I’m not exaggerating when I say that this model involves more technical interference in the internet infrastructure than what is attempted in Iran, one of the most repressive and regressive censorship regimes in the world," said Colin Jacobs of Electronic Frontiers Australia. Luckily enough, neither tier will be capable of filtering content obtained over P2P and file-sharing networks, which account for an estimated 60% of Internet traffic. Newton continues:
Australians will pay for ISP filtering with decreased performance and higher charges, but to limit the free flow of information that makes the Internet the most valuable communication and education tool of our time, means that they'll pay a much larger price in the long run, and to try and silence those who point that out is the real crime here. jared@zeropaid.com |
![]() |
members that voted for this story
|











Anyway, like the Digg comment suggests, use TOR. I wonder how TOR will affect this filter. Something tells me that they'll either block every single proxy (which would be outragous) or simply leave it be and let the people who know computers to find these things. Either way, it's a bit frightening - especially for Australian proxies, reporters, whistleblowers, etc.